Haiti’s Future Hangs in the Balance Between International Diplomacy and Gang Influence

In a complex struggle for Haiti’s future, the path forward seems to be divided into two tracks – one involving traditional political power and the other influenced by the control exerted by gangs. Following a session of intense international diplomacy in Jamaica, a coalition of Caribbean nations and the United States has proposed a solution focused on establishing a council of Influential figures. This council would be responsible for electing an interim leader and guiding Haiti towards new presidential elections, aiming to bring stability to the nation currently plagued by violence. However, in a stark contrast, a heavily armed gang leader, Jimmy “Barbecue” Chérizier, rejected any solution led and supported by the international community, asserting that the Haitian people should choose their own governance.

As political discussions unfolded on an international stage, the intricacies of Haiti’s political landscape were underscored by Prime Minister Ariel Henry’s announcement of his resignation upon the creation of a transitional presidential council. The proposed transitional council, according to Guyana President Irfaan Ali, would consist of seven voting members and two nonvoting members. The voting members include representatives from three traditional political parties, a civil-society group known as the Montana Accord, and influential figures from Haiti’s powerful private sector.

However, concerns have arisen over the extent of involvement of civil society and religious sectors in the transitional council. Critics argue that providing them with only ‘observer status’ on a council dominated by members of Haiti’s political class and their allies may not be sufficient. Michael Deibert, an author specializing in Haiti, expressed skepticism about the council composition, emphasizing the potential influence of Haiti’s disgraced political class and its associates.

The membership of the transitional council features political figures such as Moïse Jean-Charles, leader of the Pitit Desalin party, who has aligned with former rebel leader Guy Philippe. Philippe, who played a significant role in the 2004 coup against former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, was recently released from a U.S. prison after pleading guilty to money laundering. Other members include former Prime Minister Charles Joseph with the party EDE/RDE, the Fanmi Lavalas party backed by Aristide, and a coalition led by Henry.

Haitian politics expert Robert Fatton notes that the announced group’s membership appears to overlap with another recently founded group aimed at calming civil unrest. The challenges ahead involve navigating the intricate political landscape, balancing international diplomacy, and addressing domestic instability.

The delicate task of constructing a functional society in Haiti requires a nuanced approach, with experts highlighting the need for allowing Haitians to decide their path forward while acknowledging the potential role of an armed force from overseas to impose order. The future remains uncertain as Haiti grapples with the complexities of political power and the influence of gangs in shaping its destiny.