Sending unsolicited nudes will be $500 fine in Virginia

GEAR CHECK: Our readers don't just follow the news - they stay ready. Featured gear from this story is below.

Daniel Sharp

On Tuesday, Virginia lawmakers passed a bill officially making it illegal to send unsolicited nude images. The law will go into effect this summer. Backing the bill was the popular dating app Bumble.

On Tuesday, Virginia lawmakers passed a bill officially making it illegal to send unsolicited nude images. The law will go into effect this summer. Backing the bill was the popular dating app Bumble.


“Their efforts were inspired by a survey done by the company, in which nearly one out of every two women said they’ve received an unsolicited nude in their lifetime. Of those who had received a lewd image, nearly one out of three said it had been as recent as within the past month.” – Brielle Ashford (WUSA9)

A similar bill has already been passed in Texas, and comparable legislation is being discussed in California, Wisconsin, New York and Pennsylvania.

Those who perpetrate these actions in the commonwealth could face a minimum $500 fine, or more. Read the official summary of the bill below:

Civil action for the dissemination of sexually explicit visual material to another.

Provides that any person 18 years of age or older who knowingly transmits an intimate image, as defined in the bill, by computer or other electronic means to the computer or electronic communication device of another person 18 years of age or older when such other person has not consented to the use of his computer or electronic communication device for the receipt of such material or has expressly forbidden the receipt of such material shall be considered a trespass and shall be liable to the recipient of the intimate image for actual damages or $500, whichever is greater, in addition to reasonable attorney fees and costs.

The phrase “…considered a trespass and shall be liable to the recipient of the intimate image…” may be interpreted differently by different judges. However, this language sets an important legal precedent. In contrast, the full bill reads that the internet, or cellular, service provider would not be held liable.

You may also like

Blog

Vice President JD Vance has reignited debate over the Jeffrey Epstein case after suggesting the convicted sex offender likely had connections to intelligence agencies, while also acknowledging that the Trump administration mishandled its communication surrounding the release of Epstein-related files.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth expected to see a clean-shaven crew during a recent visit to a U.S. Navy ship. Instead, several sailors were still sporting beards, prompting fresh Pentagon discussions over enforcing one of his most closely watched military policies.
New reporting suggests Iranian-linked actors exploited weaknesses in global mobile networks and smartphone advertising data to track the locations of U.S. military personnel in the Middle East during the recent conflict. While officials have not publicly confirmed the full extent of the operation, cybersecurity experts say the allegations expose a serious vulnerability with implications for force protection.
A growing trade dispute between Canada and the United States is beginning to reshape how public contracts are awarded north of the border. Several Canadian provinces have introduced procurement restrictions that limit or exclude some U.S. businesses from bidding on government work, raising concerns about the future of cross-border trade.
While fans from around the world packed Kansas City for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, federal agents were carrying out another mission away from the stadiums. A multi-agency Homeland Security operation has now rescued eight missing children, identified trafficking victims, arrested dangerous offenders, and disrupted criminal activity linked to the global event.

Like This Story? Check Out What Our Community Is Buying

Our best sellers are designed for real-world use - not hype.

View Best Sellers