Air Force to remove tail numbers from aircrafts, watchdog groups unsettled

GEAR CHECK: Our readers don't just follow the news - they stay ready. Featured gear from this story is below.

Staff Writer

The US Air Force’s Air Mobility Command (AMC) recently made a controversial decision to remove all tail numbers and unit information from military aircraft, a move that has raised concerns among watchdog groups.

The US Air Force’s Air Mobility Command (AMC) recently made a controversial decision to remove all tail numbers and unit information from military aircraft, a move that has raised concerns among watchdog groups.

This decision was announced on February 23, 2023, and is expected to be implemented across all aircraft in the AMC’s fleet.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Air Mobility Command Removes Tail Numbers and Unit Info from Planes, Alarming Watchdogs <a href="https://t.co/XfeclZu6EQ">https://t.co/XfeclZu6EQ</a></p>&mdash; Military.com (@Militarydotcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/Militarydotcom/status/1631102040825819137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Watchdog groups have expressed concern that this move could hamper transparency and accountability in the use of military aircraft. Furthermore, it could make it more difficult to track the movements of military aircraft, including potential misuse or abuse.

One of the main concerns with this decision is that it could make it more difficult to track the use of military aircraft for non-mission-related purposes, such as personal travel or political events. As a result, watchdog groups fear that this could lead to increased abuse of military resources and undermine public trust in the military.

In response to these concerns, the AMC has defended its decision, stating that it is part of a broader effort to increase operational security and protect military personnel. The AMC has also argued that the removal of tail numbers and unit information from aircraft is consistent with similar practices used by other military branches.

Despite these arguments, watchdog groups remain skeptical. In a statement released on February 24, 2023, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) stated that “the removal of tail numbers and unit information from planes is a dangerous step backward for transparency and accountability in the military.”

This sentiment was echoed by other watchdog groups, including the Project on Government Oversight and the Government Accountability Project. Both of these organizations have called for the AMC to reconsider its decision and to provide more information about how this decision will impact transparency and accountability in the use of military aircraft.

It remains to be seen how this decision will ultimately play out and what the impact will be on military operations and public trust in the military.

You may also like

Blog

The deaths of American service members in Jordan and Iraq have renewed attention on the continuing dangers faced by U.S. forces deployed across the Middle East. Although separated by more than a year and occurring under different circumstances, both incidents underscore the persistent security challenges confronting American personnel in the region.
Vice President JD Vance has reignited debate over the Jeffrey Epstein case after suggesting the convicted sex offender likely had connections to intelligence agencies, while also acknowledging that the Trump administration mishandled its communication surrounding the release of Epstein-related files.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth expected to see a clean-shaven crew during a recent visit to a U.S. Navy ship. Instead, several sailors were still sporting beards, prompting fresh Pentagon discussions over enforcing one of his most closely watched military policies.
New reporting suggests Iranian-linked actors exploited weaknesses in global mobile networks and smartphone advertising data to track the locations of U.S. military personnel in the Middle East during the recent conflict. While officials have not publicly confirmed the full extent of the operation, cybersecurity experts say the allegations expose a serious vulnerability with implications for force protection.
A growing trade dispute between Canada and the United States is beginning to reshape how public contracts are awarded north of the border. Several Canadian provinces have introduced procurement restrictions that limit or exclude some U.S. businesses from bidding on government work, raising concerns about the future of cross-border trade.

Like This Story? Check Out What Our Community Is Buying

Our best sellers are designed for real-world use - not hype.

View Best Sellers